|
|

Tuesday, March 14,
2006 Section:
Technology / Page: 1
China awash in venture
capital
STUART BIGGS and MICHAEL LOGAN
Record
fund-raising combined with a dearth of deal-making has caused a
venture capital (VC) overhang in China, leading to higher
valuations and some observers to warn of a boom and bust in the
most competitive sectors.
According to China-based venture capital research company
Zero2IPO, mainland and foreign venture firms raised a record
US$4 billion last year while investments fell 16.7 per cent over
the previous year to US$1.057 billion.
A venture capital overhang results from too much cash chasing
too few deals, and while the situation seems like a boon for
China's entrepreneurs it is widely regarded as a negative for
the industry due to spiralling deal valuations and a tendency to
concentrate on blockbuster expansion investments over
traditional start-up venture funding.
The relative nascent history of VC funding in China is
characterised by multimillion-dollar deals with companies
already boasting proven records in revenue and earnings. Online
gaming company Shanda Interactive received funding from Japan's
Softbank on this basis in 2003. Softbank also invested in Focus
Media's first round in the same year when the display
advertising company was already making profits.
Last week, the mainland's Oak Pacific Interactive secured US$48
million in late stage financing - the largest ever VC deal in
China.
"The tendency to go with proven track records and proven revenue
models was the right one in the past. There were many companies
that had already developed through several rounds of self- or
local government-raised capital, so when it came to securing
institutional financing they already had proven track records,"
said Duane Kuang of Qiming Venture Partners.
"In addition, the multiples from investing in start-ups did not
make them worth the risk [at around five times revenue compared
with two or three times for established firms]."
Mr Kuang said multiples were now right for more traditional
"Silicon Valley-style early stage investments" at about 20
times. But he warned the most popular sectors, internet and
wireless services, were already showing signs of overheating.
Vincent Chan, chairman of the Hong Kong Venture Capital and
Private Equity Association and vice-president of Jafco
Investment, said an influx of US venture capital firms was
pushing up valuations.
"The pot is getting bigger. [Valuations have] gone up even
higher. United States VCs are setting up new offices in Beijing
and Shanghai every month," he said.
But much of the focus was concentrated on mid- to late-stage
investments. "There are still some VCs willing to invest in the
early stage or pre-revenue stage," he said. "However, many
former small fund managers have been able to raise much larger
funds [this year and last].
"There is a general tendency for them to work on bigger deals.
Some have changed focus from venture into growth capital and
compete with the traditional expansion capital investors.
"I believe there is a funding gap between early stage and late
stage."
That may be putting it mildly. Shanghai-based venture capitalist
Adam Bornstein warned of "a massive glut" in mid-stage funding.
"In the US there are well-organised angel investor communities
and a number of early stage VCs nurturing young entrepreneurs
that ensure a fertile middle ground," he said.
"However, in China there really isn't anything like this. The
reality of the situation is that this overhang ... is polarising
the market, whereby funding is flowing to ventures with higher
valuations while starving promising early-stage opportunities."
This trend is not surprising. With so many VCs raising
substantial funds in the past 12 months, including Qiming, SAIF
Partners, Sequoia Capital China, Intel Capital and IDG
Technology Venture Investments, the onus is now on them to
deploy the capital.
Time frames might differ but large funds usually chased larger
deals of at least US$4 million, Mr Bornstein said.
If the process of due diligence was the same for small deals as
well as large ones, it made sense to concentrate on the latter.
"These VCs [also] can't justify dipping into ventures priced
below US$4 million [pre-money] because if they did the VC would
end up owning a majority of the company, and there would be
little upside for the entrepreneur."
But few venture capitalists interviewed by the South China
Morning Post seemed unduly put off by the higher valuations in
the most sought-after sectors. Jafco this month has poured an
undisclosed amount into a mainland mobile advertising firm that
had been incorporated only in January.
But Mr Chan said not every deal could be early stage because of
the time and resources involved in guiding their development.
Cadol Cheung, Asia managing director for Intel Capital,
acknowledged expectations of higher valuations among China's
entrepreneurs was increasing but argued that whether they had
become unrealistic ultimately depended on the value gained at
the exit.
"If the exit market is good then the valuations will rise
accordingly," he said. "Wireless is hot right now in VC
interest, but it is also a strategic interest for Intel."
Others saw opportunities away from the buzz, such as Mr Kuang,
who predicted better value and good growth prospects in
semiconductors and software.
Meanwhile Mr Bornstein, a smaller player in comparison with the
large international funds, appears to enjoy looking at
opportunities others overlook.
"We get to pick the ripest ideas and most talented management
teams," he said.
Copyright
� 2006. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights
reserved.
Any redistribution of information contained in this archive
without permission is
strictly prohibited.
|
|